Model Exchange Notice Available for Employers to Share with Employees

This information is reprinted with permission from United Healthcare.

All employers which are subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) must comply with this notification requirement. In general, the FLSA applies to employers that employ one or more employees who are engaged in, or produce goods for, interstate commerce. For most firms, a test of not less than $500,000 in annual dollar volume of business applies. The FLSA also specifically covers the following entities: hospitals; institutions primarily engaged in the care of the sick, the aged, mentally ill, or disabled who reside on the premises; schools for children who are mentally or physically disabled or gifted; preschools, elementary and secondary schools, and institutions of higher education; and federal, state and local government agencies. The Department of Labor has an online decision tool to allow employers to determine if the FLSA applies to their organization.

On May 8, 2013, the Department of Labor (DOL) issued Technical Release 2013-02 which provides temporary guidance for employers regarding the requirement to notify employees of coverage options available through Exchanges, also called Health Insurance Marketplaces.
This Model Notice to Employees of Coverage Options is available for employers to use today if they wish. Employers must provide notice to current employees by Oct. 1, 2013.
There are two model notices. Both forms require the employer to enter specific information before distributing to employees.

Model Notice for employers who offer a health plan
Model Notice for employers who do not offer a health plan

Employers may use one of these models, as applicable, or a modified version, provided the notice meets the content requirements. The notice must be provided in writing in a manner understood by the average employee. The notice may be provided to employees by first-class mail or electronically if in accordance with the DOL regulations.

In January, the DOL delayed the deadline for employers to notify employees of the availability of Exchanges from March 1, 2013, to late summer or early fall of 2013. The DOL issued this temporary guidance and model notice in advance of the expected timeframe because it received several requests from employers for a model notice on an earlier timeframe. Employers are not required to use this temporary guidance and may wait until final guidance is issued later this year.

UnitedHealthcare will not be creating a version of this notice, and employers may use the DOL version if they wish. Providing notice of coverage options is an employer obligation. Employers may want to use the Minimum Value Calculator posted on The Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight website to determine if their plan meets the minimum value requirements.

Who Must Receive the Notice?
Employers that are subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), regardless of size, funding type or if they offer health coverage today or not, must provide a notice of coverage options to each employee. Employees must receive the notice whether or not they are enrolled in a health plan today or if they are part-time or full-time.
Employers are not required to provide a separate notice to dependents or other individuals who are or may become eligible for coverage under the plan but who are not employees.

What Must the Notice Include?
The notice to inform employees of coverage options must include information regarding the existence of an Exchange as well as contact information and description of the services it provides. The notice must include:
• Information regarding the existence of the Exchanges as well as contact information and description of the services provided by an Exchange;
• A statement informing the employee that if the employee purchases a qualified health plan through the Exchange, the employee may lose the employer contribution (if any) to any health benefits plans offered by the employer and that all or a portion of such contribution may be excludable from income for Federal income tax purposes ; and
• If the employer plan’s share of the total allowed costs of benefits provided under the plan is less than 60 percent of such costs, the employee may be eligible for a premium tax credit if the employee purchases a qualified health plan through the Exchange.
What is the Deadline that Employers Must Issue the Notice to Employees?
Current employees must receive the notice before Oct. 1, 2013. The notice is required to be provided automatically, free of charge. Employers are required to provide the notice to each new employee at the time of hiring beginning Oct. 1, 2013. For 2014, the DOL will consider a notice to be provided at the time of hiring if the notice is provided within 14 days of an employee’s start date.
Model COBRA Election Notice Available
• Some qualified beneficiaries may want to consider and compare health coverage alternatives to COBRA continuation coverage that are available through the Exchange as they may also be eligible for a premium tax credit. Therefore, the DOL has revised the COBRA model election notice to help make qualified beneficiaries aware of other coverage options available in the Exchanges.
• The notice also includes a new notation that plans may no longer impose any pre-existing condition exclusions beginning in 2014 pursuant to the ACA, and not just those tied to covered individuals under the age of 19.
The model COBRA election notice is available in modifiable, electronic form:
• COBRA Model General Notice | en español
For more information, visit the DOL website.

Please urge Gov. Nixon to sign pro-jobs bills into law

 In the recently concluded 2013 Legislative Session, lawmakers passed extensive pro-jobs legislation that will make a significant impact on Missouri employers’ bottom lines. This legislation now waits the signature of Gov. Jay Nixon in order to become law. Some of this legislation impacts specific industries. However, there are several broadbased issues pending. We are asking our members to please take time to weigh in on one or all of these broadbased bills and contact Gov. Nixon to let him know how important this legislation is to your business and jobs in this state.

Below is contact information for Gov. Jay Nixon. We have also provided a brief description of each issue.   Gov. Jay Nixon Phone – 573-751-3222 Email – http://governor.mo.gov/contact/ Mail – P.O. Box 720, Jefferson City, MO 65102 ________________________________________

Senate Bill 1 – Workers’ Compensation Reforms Senate Bill 1 narrows the claims that are currently run through the Second Injury Fund and sets up a mechanism for returning the SIF to solvency. The legislation also brings all occupational diseases back under the workers’ compensation system.   Highlights of Senate Bill 1

. The long-term financial and legal liability this legislation removes from employers’ backs is great. It also helps employees get the benefits they deserve, and that’s also important for employers.

. SB 1 limits the types of claims that can be run through the Second Injury Fund. The bill removes all permanent partial disability from SIF, which is 80 percent of all SIF claims.

. The bill provides a long-term plan to pay off the $1 billion in liability that currently exists within the system. Currently the Second Injury Fund is $32 million in the red, with more than 1,200 people with outstanding claims. However, more than 30,000 claims are pending adjudication, saddling Missouri employers with great financial liability.

. SB 1 also reduces the interest rate from 9 percent to 5 percent that employers are currently paying on outstanding claims. This will save employers millions of dollars annually.

. The bill brings all occupational diseases back under the workers’ compensation system, where these conditions have been handled since Missouri’s workers’ compensation system was established. Nine toxic exposure conditions will be eligible for enhanced remedy of up to $150,000 and guaranteed death benefits. The toxic exposure condition of mesothelioma will be eligible for $500,000 in enhanced remedy. SB 1 provides an employer the option to have coverage for mesothelioma under work comp policy, to pay for remedy out of a pool to be administered by the Department of Labor, or address any mesothelioma cases in circuit court. This option gives employers the choice on how to handle these risks.

. Rather than continue to let occupational diseases be a target for trial attorneys, SB 1 provides protections for both employers and employees. Currently, employees can take common ailments such as carpal tunnel syndrome and repetitive motion injuries to the courts, requiring months and thousands of dollars to resolve. ________________________________________

House Bill 611 – Unemployment Insurance Reforms

House Bill 611 would keep Missouri’s unemployment insurance program in compliance with federal mandates and protect federal funding that Missouri employers receive. The legislation also redefines the definition of misconduct, to limit abuses of the system by employees that the system was not intended to cover.

Highlights of House Bill 611:

. House Bill 611 creates two new tools for combating unemployment insurance fraud as directed by the Trade Adjustment Assistance Extension Act. One provision establishes a monetary penalty for claimants who commit intentional fraud. Another provision penalizes employers who fail to respond to requests by the DOL for information.

. Failure to meet compliance was attached to a heavy price tag: More than $1 billion would be lost to Missouri employers and the state, including $859 million in FUTA tax credits annually, $46 million in federal grants it receives each year to administer the unemployment compensation system, and $13 million in federal funds the Department of Economic Development-Division of Workforce Development receives each year to administer re-employment services.

. Non-compliance would also jeopardize all federal funding for the Tile IV-D program – more than $58 million. It would also risk the loss of federal funding for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program – up to $217 million.

. In addition to protecting federal funding, HB 611 will save Missouri employers, by redefining “misconduct” for which an employee may be disqualified from unemployment benefits. The legislation was passed overwhelmingly by lawmakers after floor debate that included stories about Missouri workplaces where employees were granted benefits after being fired for stealing from employers, taking illegal drugs at work, and even public urination while on the job at a school. ________________________________________

House Bill 128 – Tax Reform (Apportionment Factor)

House Bill 128 authorizes an alternative method for calculating the taxable income of a Missouri corporation, which could provide significant tax savings for many employers and also encourage keeping more jobs in our state.

Highlights of House Bill 128:

. Missouri currently allows corporations to calculate their taxable business income through a three-factor formula based on sales, property and payroll, or through a single-factor formula based only on sales. When using the single-factor formula, 100 percent of the company’s intrastate sales and 50 percent of its interstate sales are combined and then divided by gross sales to determine the apportionment percentage. Unfortunately, this calculation method is a disincentive for businesses to produce goods in Missouri that are primarily sold in other states.

. The Missouri Chamber, which advocated for the measure, calls it the “Made in Missouri Act,” because it would help businesses that manufacture products in Missouri for sales outside the state grow production in Missouri rather than shifting the jobs into other states.

________________________________________

House Bill 650 – Omnibus Environmental Protection Bill

House Bill 650 is legislation that contains numerous provisions relating to the environment and the Department of Natural Resources. The bill contains several strong provisions for Missouri employers.

Highlights of House Bill 650:

. One of the key benefits of House Bill 650 for Missouri employers is a provision that would provide successor liability tort reform, by capping punitive damages that can be assessed against employers from actions of previous business owners.

. House Bill 650 helps to streamline the environmental permitting process for Missouri employers, helping reduce the time and cost this process currently takes, while ensuring that Missouri’s natural resources are protected.

. The legislation extends the clean water fees, keeping the funding stream viable to maintain state control of this water regulation.

________________________________________

House Bill 34 and Senate Bill 29 – Labor Reform Issues

Labor reform issues made unprecedented progress in the 2013 Legislative Session. In the past, we were lucky to see labor legislation even receive a hearing. This session, lawmakers took bold measures to debate and pass strong measures that would benefit Missouri taxpayers and workers.

Highlights of House Bill 34:

. Waiting signature by Gov. Jay Nixon is House Bill 34, legislation that eliminates the prevailing wage mandate on new construction of public projects in much of outstate Missouri (3rd and 4th class counties).

. Prevailing wage law is antiquated policy that has outlived its purpose. This legislation addresses that fact and provides relief to outstate Missouri, where it is needed most.

. We believe it will save thousands of taxpayers’ dollars on public projects. This is money that can instead be spent on education and other public needs, not artificially inflated wages.

Highlights of Senate Bill 29:

. Senate Bill 29, legislation that would protect employees’ paychecks from going to political candidates and campaigns for which they do not support, also awaits signature by Gov. Jay Nixon.

. The bill would require an employee to give approval in writing to an employer or labor organization before a political contribution could be taken out of that employee’s paycheck.

. Using employees’ money for politicians or issues that they do not support goes against the very tenants this country was built upon. Employees have a right to say what is taken out of their paychecks for political campaigns.   If you have questions, contact Tracy King, Missouri Chamber vice president of governmental affairs, at tking@mochamber.com, or by phone at 573-634-3511.

Missouri Chamber says Missouri is missing opportunity as a result of Gov. Nixon’s veto

JEFFERSON CITY – Gov. Nixon’s veto today of House Bill 253 will result in missed opportunities for Missouri. 

“Every working Missourian would have received a tax cut, said Dan Mehan, Missouri Chamber President and CEO.  “One of the strongest economic development tools that our state could have put to work for our state was taken away today by Gov. Jay Nixon.”

Missourians would have received a $384 million tax cut.  Missouri small employers would have seen their taxes reduced as well, and all employers would have their corporate tax rate cut in half.

The Missouri Chamber voiced its concern earlier that Gov. Nixon was considering vetoing the bill because a drafting error made by his Department of Revenue in bill language provided to lawmakers.  Commonly known as the streamlined sales tax, the measure has been pushed by Nixon’s Department of Revenue for years and the department gave assurances to lawmakers that this was the appropriate language to implement it.  In his State of the State address, Gov. Nixon called on lawmakers to pass this streamlined sales tax bill.

“The Missouri Chamber does not believe that Missouri taxpayers should be punished for an error made by Nixon’s Department of Revenue,” said Mehan.  “It is extremely frustrating that one error could cost so much to Missouri taxpayers.”

The legislation was billed by lawmakers as a common-sense approach to controlling the growth of state government.  The tax cuts would not go into effect unless the state had revenue growth of $1 billion over ten years.

“The bill contains protections for the state, should the economy take a swing downward,” Mehan said.  “And, ultimately, it was designed to slow the pace of growth of government.  It was a tool to help Missouri invest economic growth back into our employers and workers, not into the growth of government.”

The Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry (www.mochamber.com) was founded in 1923 and is the largest business organization in Missouri, representing almost 3,000 employers, providing more than 425,000 jobs for Missourians.

 

Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry to Host Seminar on Affordable Care Act in Cape Girardeau

MEDIA ADVISORY

 

Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry

to Host Seminar on Affordable Care Act in Cape Girardeau

Affordable Care Act: What Your Business Needs to Know

 

JEFFERSON CITY, MO– The Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry will host health care, government, and business leaders to address the Affordable Care Act and how it will impact businesses and business owners.

 

WHO:              Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry

                        Cape Girardeau Chamber of Commerce

 

WHAT:          Affordable Care Act: What your Business Needs to Know

 

WHEN:          Tuesday, June 4, 2013 – 8 a.m. CST

 

WHERE:       Drury Lodge

104 South Vantage

Cape Girardeau, MO 63701

 

Members of the media are invited to attend all or portions of the program, however, only print and broadcast journalists may audio or video record any portion of the event.

 

The Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry (www.mochamber.com) was founded in 1923 and is the largest business association in Missouri, representing almost 3,000 employers providing more than 425,000 jobs for Missourians.

 

###

 

Agenda June 4, 2013 – Cape Girardeau – Drury Lodge

 

8:00 a.m.

Registration

8:30 a.m.

Opening Remarks – Missouri Chamber of Commerce & Industry

8:45 a.m.

Overview of ACA

Speaker: Thomas McAuliffe, Policy Analyst, Missouri Foundation for Health

• History of the law

• Outline of affected parties – small, medium, large, individual

• Timeline for implementation

9:30 a.m.

Employer Requirements and Fees 2013

Speaker: Attorneys with Polsinelli P.C. – Courtney Vomund

• Overview of current mandates

• Afforded Coverage

• Rules for FTE determination and communication

• Assessment of fees

10:00 a.m.

Employer Requirements and Fees 2014

Speaker: Attorneys with Polsinelli P.C. – Courtney Vomund

• Fee escalation schedule

• Differences in eligibility and coverage

• Automatic enrollment

• “Pay or Play” impact and analysis

• Small employer alternatives

10:30 a.m.

Break

10:45 a.m.

Changes to the Administration

Speaker: Attorneys with Polsinelli P.C. – Courtney Vomund

• Reporting

• Flexible Spending Accounts, Health Reimbursement Arrangements, Health Savings Accounts

• Communication to employees

• Safe Harbor options

• Rehires – How to Measure Eligibility and Other Unique Issues

11:30 a.m.

Lunch

12:15 p.m.

State Exchanges

Speaker: Thomas McAuliffe, Policy Analyst, Missouri Foundation for Health

• Where Missouri is, and where we are headed

• What does this mean for employers at all levels

12:45 p.m.

Insurance Overview of the Act and Tax Update

Speakers: Dan Timmerman, Practice Leader, Schwartz Brothers Insurance & Jamie McDonald, Partner, BKD CPAs & Advisors

• Compliance Requirements

• Financial Liabilities

• Tax Implications

• Penalty Projections

• Cost of Terminating your Plan

1:45 p.m.

Concluding Remarks and Questions – Missouri Chamber of Commerce & Industry

2:00 p.m.

Adjourn

Missouri Chamber supports Senate action on tax cut

“In an effort to boost Missouri’s economy and allow Missourians to keep more of their hard-earned wages, the Missouri General Assembly has passed legislation to provide broad-based tax relief, and we applaud their efforts,” said Missouri Chamber Vice President of Governmental Affairs Tracy King.
Today, the Missouri Senate passed House Bill 253, legislation that cuts the corporate tax rate in half and reduces individual taxes by $384 million. The cuts would be phased in over ten years.
The legislation is sponsored by Rep. T.J. Berry and was handled in the Senate by Sen. Eric Schmitt. Sen. Will Kraus also was instrumental is supporting this legislation and he has sponsored similar legislation this session. With the Missouri Senate’s vote today, the bill now goes back to the House for approval or to call a conference with the Senate to work out differences on the legislation.
“One of the strongest economic development tools we can provide is broad-based tax relief, which is contained in this bill,” said King. “It allows existing businesses to keep more of their earnings to reinvest in workers and expansion. At the same time, it gives prospective employers a strong reason to move to our state. What’s more, it gives workers an opportunity to keep more of their paychecks.”
The Missouri Chamber has been a strong proponent of this approach, and is committed to using this legislation as a recruiting tool, should the governor sign it into law.
“We can tell prospective employers ‘Come to Missouri, where we reward productivity, not overtax it,’” King said.
The bill contains protections for the state, should the economy take a swing downward. The tax reductions would not be implemented unless state tax collections exceed the highest tax collections from the previous three years by $100 million.
Senate supporters of the bill said the beauty of the legislation is that it will only go into effect if Missouri’s revenue grows. Ultimately, it is designed to slow the pace of growth of government.
“What that means is that rather than put increased revenues into growing government, Missouri is choosing to invest in its businesses and workers,” said King.
In addition to the tax cuts, the legislation also includes provisions that would allow Missouri to take steps toward securing sales tax from Internet sales. These provisions are estimated to bring Missouri more than $13 million annually, according to estimates by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board.

The legislation also would implement a tax amnesty program. The Missouri Office of Administration estimates that this could provide an influx of outstanding tax revenue of $51 million.

The Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry (www.mochamber.com) was founded in 1923 and is the largest business organization in Missouri, representing almost 3,000 employers, providing more than 425,000 jobs for Missourians.

Missouri House sends prevailing wage reform to Gov. Nixon for signature

 On a vote of 93-64, the Missouri House has given final approval to House Bill 34, legislation that eliminates the prevailing wage mandate on new construction of public projects in much of outstate Missouri (3rd and 4th class counties).  House Bill 34, sponsored by Rep. Casey Guernsey, now heads to the governor’s desk for signature.

“Prevailing wage law is antiquated policy that needs to be eliminated.  We are pleased to see the passage of this legislation, which provides relief from prevailing wage law to outstate Missouri, where it is needed most,” said Brendan Cossette, Missouri Chamber director of legislative affairs and assistant general counsel.  “We believe it will save thousands of taxpayers’ dollars on public projects.  This is money that can instead be spent on education and other public needs, not artificially inflated wages.”

The Missouri Chamber has a long-standing position against prevailing wage mandates and will further advocate that this practice be applied to all work in public projects in all Missouri counties.

“If Gov. Nixon wants to be a good steward of taxpayers’ money, he will sign this legislation into law,” said Cossette. 

The Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry (www.mochamber.com) was founded in 1923 and is the largest business organization in Missouri, representing almost 3,000 employers, providing more than 425,000 jobs for Missourians.

Don’t punish Missouri taxpayers for drafting error, says Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry

 The Missouri Chamber is strongly urging Gov. Nixon to sign House Bill 253 despite a drafting error that was made by Nixon’s Department of Revenue (DOR) in language the department provided to bill drafters.  The main provisions of the bill would reduce small business taxes, cut the corporate tax rate in half and lower individual taxes by $384 million, phased in over ten years.  The bill also guarantees the state would receive at least $1 billion in future revenue growth before the reductions would take effect.

However, the governor distributed a press release today citing concerns that additional language within the bill – language that would allow Missouri to take steps toward securing sales tax from internet sales – would cost Missourians who use prescription drugs $200 million annually.  Commonly known as the streamlined sales tax, the measure has been pushed by Nixon’s Department of Revenue for years and the department gave assurances to lawmakers that this was the appropriate language to implement it.  In his State of the State address, Gov. Nixon called on lawmakers to pass this streamlined sales tax bill.

“Missouri taxpayers should not be punished for an error made by Nixon’s Department of Revenue,” said Tracy King, Missouri Chamber vice president of governmental affairs.  “There is a way to work around the error, as the streamlined sales tax provision would not go into effect until January 2015.  We urge the governor to sign the bill and allow lawmakers to fix the drafting error when they are back in Jefferson City during a special legislative session or in the 2014 Legislative Session.”

The legislation was a priority of the Missouri Chamber on several levels.

“One of the strongest economic development tools we can provide is broad-based tax relief, which is contained in this bill,” said King.  “It allows existing businesses to keep more of their earnings to reinvest in workers and expansion.  At the same time, it gives prospective employers a strong reason to move to our state.  What’s more, it gives workers an opportunity to keep more of their paychecks.”

The streamlined sales tax language was filed in at least five other bills this legislative session and all bills contained the language provided by Nixon’s Department of Revenue.

“What is so frustrating is that DOR had time to vet this language before this bill was passed,” said King.  “Every time a bill is filed or any version of the bill is changed through the legislative process, the department is required to thoroughly review and report its impact and make recommendations for changes.  This didn’t happen and now Missouri’s business community and the taxpayers in this state will lose millions due to this oversight if the governor chooses to veto this bill.”

The Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry (www.mochamber.com) was founded in 1923 and is the largest business organization in Missouri, representing almost 3,000 employers, providing more than 425,000 jobs for Missourians.